|
Injury
Corn that is less than 15-18 inches tall is not very susceptible to corn borer injury. Plants this height possess a compound called DIMBOA that prevent larvae from establishing. Larvae that feed on smallcorn generally fail to establish and wander off the plants and die. As plants mature, the concentration of DIMBOA decreases, andthey become more susceptible to corn borer injury. Early planted corn is most susceptible to larval feedingby first-generation of borers.
Corn borer larvae feed on all parts of the corn plant except the roots. First-generation larvae are found feeding on the leaves of corn in mid-to-late whorl stages. They chew small holes in the leaves creating a "buckshot" effect. As corn borers mature they leave the whorl and begin tunneling in leaf midribs and sheaths. After reaching approximately 1/2 inch in length (third instar) borers tunnel into the stalk, and feed until full grown. The second generation is present on corn after tassels have emerged. They feed on pollen in leaf axils or on leaves. As they get larger, they feed on leaf sheaths, collars, and midribs until they eventually enter the stalk. Second generation corn borers also may enter the ear or earshank. Tunneling in the stalks by larvae affect the plant's ability to transfer nutrients. This often reduces grain weight and kernel number. Yield losses are due primarily to physiological damage. Stalk breakage and lodging, ear droppageand secondary invasion of stalk rots into susceptible varietiesalso contribute to yield loss.
Management Worksheet for First-Generation European Corn Borer |
____ Larvae found | x | ____ Expected Survival1,2 | = | ____ Surviving larvae |
____ Surviving larvae | / | ____ Plants examined | = | ____ Larvae per plant |
____ Larvae per plant | x | ____ Yield loss per larvae3 | = | ____ Yield Loss |
____ Yield Loss | x | ____ Expected yield (bu/A) | = | ____ Loss (bu/A) |
____ Loss (bu/A) | x | $___ Price per bushel | = | $___ Loss per acre |
$___ Loss per acre | x | ____ Control4 | = | $___ Preventable loss per acre |
$___ Preventable loss per acre | - | $___ Control of cost per acre | = | $___ Gain (+) or loss (-) per acre if control applied |
Notes:
1Record all percentages as decimals (for example, 20% = 0.2).
2If larvae are newly hatched (1st instar), it is likely that only 20% will survive to maturity, depending on environmental stress. If larvae are 2nd instar, the survival rate may increase to 50%. Adjust this number accordingly.
3Use 0.06 for V10 corn, or 0.05 for V16 (green tassel) corn. When borer numbers reach or exceed 3 per plant, the loss caused by each additional borer will decrease.
480% control with granules (aerial or ground application) and with sprays directed over the whorls (ground application); the more effective insecticides provide comparable control when applied as broadcast sprays (aerial application).
|
Scouting Procedure
Degree Days
Degree day accumulations can be used to predict biological events such as the life stages of the European corn borer. The accumulation of degree days (base 50°F) begins with the initial capture of moths in the spring. Degree days can be an effective tool to provideassistance when scouting for European corn borer.
First Generation European Corn Borer |
Accumulated
Degree-Days |
First occurrence |
Days to first occurrence |
General activity |
0 |
First spring moth |
- |
- |
212 |
Larval hatch (1st instar) |
16.3 |
Pinhole leaf feeding |
318 |
2nd instar |
6.6 |
Shot-hole feeding |
435 |
3rd instar |
6.5 |
Mid-rib & stalk boring |
567 |
4th instar |
6.6 |
Stalk boring |
792 |
5th instar |
10.2 |
Stalk boring |
1,002 |
Pupa |
7.6 |
Changing to adult |
Second Generation European Corn Borer |
Accumulated
Degree-Days |
First occurrence |
Days to first occurrence |
General activity |
0 |
First spring moth |
- |
- |
1,404 |
Larval hatch (1st instar) |
8.2 |
Pollen & leaf axil feeding |
1,510 |
2nd instar |
4.1 |
Leaf axil feeding |
1,627 |
3rd instar |
4.3 |
Sheath, collar, & midrib feeding |
1,759 |
4th instar |
5.1 |
Stalk boring |
1,984 |
5th instar |
10.2 |
Stalk boring |
First-Generation
The easiest method of scouting for first generation European corn borer is to look for larvae and whorl damage after the eggs have hatched. Examine 100 plants (5 sets of 20) and record the percentage with whorl feeding. Dissect two damaged plants per set and record the total number of larvae found on 10 plants. Younger larvae may be found by unrolling the leaves of the whorl or looking behind the leaf sheaths. Older larvae may be found by splitting the stalk. Larvae should be separated and counted by instar. Early planted corn is more susceptible to damage by first-generation European corn borer.
To decide whether it would be profitable to treat a field infested with first generation corn borers, the use of a threshold guide may be useful to help determine whethera potential yield loss may occur.
Second-Generation
For the second-generation, egg mass counts are the preferred method of scouting. Start checking for egg masses in corn when corn borer moths are being collected in light or pheromone traps. Fields most likely to be infested are those where the corn is green, succulent, shedding pollen, or has green silks in late July and early August. Look for egg masses on the underside of leaves above and below the ear zone. If time permits, check all leaves on a plant for egg masses. Egg laying by the second brood may extend over a period of 3 to 4 weeks.
Count the total number of egg masses on 50 random plants. The masses are usually laid on the under-surface of the leaves near the midrib. These leaves can be most easily examined by stripping them from the plant to look for the egg masses. Late planted corn is more susceptible to damage by second-generation European corn borers. Record the number of egg massesfound and multiply by 2 to obtain the number per 100 plants. If needed, treatments should be applied at the time when most of the eggs are hatching or in the black head stage.
If some of the eggs have hatched, it may be necessary to dissect the stalk to determine if the borers have entered the stalk andcannot be reached with an insecticide. Usually there will be sawdust-like frassleft at the entry hole in a leaf axilor behind a leaf sheath. Do not confuse an empty first-generation cavity on the lower portion of the plant with a new cavity from the second generation.
Management
Managing the European corn borer is a very difficult task. Adultcorn borers are very mobile, thus making strategies such as crop rotation and tactics that isolate the crop ineffective. It is also difficult to predict accurately economic levels of European corn borer from year to year. Cultural practices such as stalk shredding or plowing in the fall may reduce the survival of overwintering larvae; however, due to the mobility of moths, this practice is not recommended as a management practice.
A resistant or tolerant hybrid also may be a consideration in management planning. Some "conventional" hybrids are resistant to first generation borers while others have some degree of tolerance to corn borer injury. Most seed corn companies have hybrids with some type of resistance to leaf feeding caused by the European corn borer.However, since the late 1970's, fewer acres have been planted to these hybrids. The inbred line B73, which is widely used in hybrid combinations because of its high yield potential, also is susceptible to corn borer feeding.
Since the mid-1990s, transgenic hybrids have become commercially available. These hybrids that have been genetically transformed to include a gene from a naturally occurring soil bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis(Bt). The gene produces protein crystals (Cry proteins) that are toxic to corn borer larvae. Once ingested, the Cry proteins break down and produce a toxin that ruptures the lining of the insect's gut. This causes the borers to stop feeding and die within a few days. Bt hybrids offer season long protection against the European corn borer.
The decision to use insecticides to manage corn borers is often decided with the use of management worksheets. Scouting is key to determining corn borer populations. Controlling first-generation corn borers in the whorl can be an effective management approach. Timing of insecticide applications for second generation is more difficult. Once larvae begin boring into the stalk, insecticide applications are ineffective.
Authors
Kelly A. Cook (kcook8@uiuc.edu)
Susan T. Ratcliffe(sratclif@uiuc.edu)
Michael E. Gray (megray@uiuc.edu)
Kevin L. Steffey(ksteffey@uiuc.edu) |